Build interpretation, not recognition
This module trains the first layer of case interpretation: what each WAIS-IV and WMS-IV measure shows, which task demands can alter performance, how to speak accurately about scores, and how to avoid conclusions that the evidence cannot support.
Your 15-day route
Module 1 should reach at least 85% mastery by the end of Day 3. The remaining modules build on this foundation.
Mastery by skill
Error profile
The trainer classifies the conceptual source of each error, then lets you add your own diagnosis.
How the module teaches
You answer before seeing the explanation, including within worked examples.
Guidance falls from 100% to 0% across five interpretations.
Accuracy and confidence determine when an item returns during the 15-day sprint.
WAIS-IV and WMS-IV measures are mixed after the first exposure.
Later tasks require a written reason, not only a selected answer.
High-confidence errors are treated as priorities because they reveal miscalibrated knowledge.
Measure-to-construct maps
Connect each measure to all of its principal constructs. The left card fills partly after each correct cable and becomes fully green only when every required connection is made.
Secondary-demand maps
Learn why a low score cannot be assigned automatically to a single cognitive deficit. Connect each measure to the additional perceptual, language, motor, attentional or emotional demands that can influence it.
Score systems and normative language
Identify the metric before interpreting the number. This section trains standard scores, scaled scores, T-scores, z-scores, percentiles, confidence intervals, base rates and careful discrepancy language.
What cannot be concluded?
Choose the statement that overreaches the available evidence. These items train disciplined clinical language and prevent causal, localisation and premorbid overclaims.
Stepwise worked interpretations
Predict each next reasoning step before it is revealed. Guidance fades across the five examples until the final interpretation is independently generated.
Abbreviated Mr K case
Use the same sequence required in the examination: normative interpretation, intra-test analysis, inter-test integration, premorbid estimation, expected versus manifested deficits, and synthesis.
Adaptive review queue
Items return according to accuracy, confidence and prior streak. Incorrect high-confidence answers are prioritised because they indicate a misconception rather than uncertainty.
Due now
Next reviews
Sources and limits
The trainer uses official public Pearson reporting materials and learning-science research. It does not reproduce proprietary test items, scoring tables or restricted manual content.